How is debating a Muslim and a Christian different?

Besides the Christian tendency to use appeals to emotion and arguments from incredulity, and reject evidence not based on the Bible, and the Muslim habit of using diversionary tactics (such as changing the topic to the Bible, or every evil act Israel has ever committed) and the No True Muslim fallacy, and censor or otherwise inconclusively end the debate when they can no longer defend their position, what differences have you found between the two?